Skip to main content

The end of the Scottish Conservatives opens up a new opportunity for Scotland- and for the Scottish Liberal Democrats

The election of a new Scottish Conservative leader is not usually an occasion of great moment in British politics. From being the preeminent force in Scotland in the 1950s the party now has only the rather gauche and lumpen David Mundell to represent them at Westminster, and even that is by the thinnest of margins.

Yet the choice that the Scottish Conservatives will reveal tomorrow will mark a significant change. Either they will choose the uncertain risk of Murdo Fraser, who has said openly that he intends to remake and even rename the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party or they will vote for an apparently safer choice in Ruth Davidson,who is said to be the choice of the London party leadership, but who is otherwise both rather inexperienced and a rather unconvincing proponent of the discredited status quo in the party.

In my view, whether Murdo Fraser wins or not, he has already opened up an intriguing possibility for Scottish political realignment.

The Socialist hegemony in Scotland has been a disaster- by every conceivable measure the health and wealth of Scotland has been undermined by the creation of a corrupt network of political patronage orchestrated by a political machine that for sheer malignity equals the very worst that Tammany Hall could offer. The public sector, by almost every measure, has grown to top 60% of the economic activity of Scotland. Labour became the party of the Scottish establishment over the course of the past three decades, and over that time the Scottish economy has grown ever less competitive and ever less efficient. After the Labour lock in Scottish politics was broken by the creation of the Scottish Parliament elected under a proportional system, the power of the party has undergone a dramatic decline. Socialism is increasingly dead in Scotland.

Yet the chief beneficiaries of the decline of Socialism have been the Separatist SNP. Paradoxically this is has been because they have absorbed many of the most radical Conservatives. Their solution to Socialism is to to adopt a shock therapy in Scotland similar to that of the ex-Communist countries, and the only way to do that is to break up the Common Kingdom and impose these dramatic policies by going it alone. 

However the already severe economic dislocation that such a shock therapy would impose on the Scottish economy would be compounded by the massive restructuring of the Scottish financial system that independence would force. The asset base of the RBS group alone is a multiple of the size of Scotland's economy. There is simply no way that an independent Scotland can support such a behemoth bank, particularly since at the outset an independent Scotland would have a massive deficit- which the Bank of England would force them to address, if they wanted to continue to use Sterling. An independent currency would immediately devalue against Sterling, leaving Scotland poorer, even before the impact of the shock therapy and the bank restructuring had its first impact. The Naval and RAF bases would close, yet the new state would need to take on huge new expenses, from a separate diplomatic corps to a new customs agency- even if there was no border at Bewick.

If Socialism is dead, Separatism is a dead end, with a horrible economic sting in the tail if it ever happens.

The fact is that unless we want to see the wealth of Scotland decline by 40%-50%, with all the social woes that would cause, we should address the appalling economic and social legacy of Socialism by taking decisions within the framework of the Common Kingdom. By all means let Scotland take as many of those decisions in Scotland as it can- not just in a centralized government in Edinburgh, as the SNP insists, but at the local level too- but it would be raving madness for us to lose the option of the help and assistance that can come from the rest of the UK as the country seeks a more business minded, entrepreneurial and freer future.

The Scottish Liberal Democrats are not "Socialism Lite", and never have been, even if many Socialists were prepared to lend us their votes. We are a radical free market party, that nonetheless believes in corporate social responsibility. There are many economic positions that the Liberal Democrats share with many Conservatives. Where we parted company from the Tories was in our profound belief in Home Rule. The Scottish Parliament was an achievement that was the crowning glory of such great home rulers as Rae Michie, Russell Johnston,  and dare I say it, Ross Finnie,  David Steel, Malcolm Bruce, and Jim Wallace.

The adamant "Unionism" of the Tories was in our view just as much of a catastrophe as Socialism or Separatism. Now, Murdo Fraser is putting forward an imaginative policy that is very similar to our own.

Whether Murdo Fraser achieves the leadership of the Tories tomorrow or not, in a way he has already scored a victory: he is putting forward the possibility of a positive Scottish Federalism- and that is something that the Scottish Liberal Democrats can only view with satisfaction: Murdo, it may have taken a long time, but at last you are with us. 

A Federalist bloc of Liberals and those Reformers who want to jump the walls of the Unionist Tory prison may yet be able to lead Scotland away from both dead Socialism and dead-end Separatism and create a better nation: both for Scotland and for Britain.

In my view, that is not only the best future for Scotland, it is what the people of Scotland want. 

The SNP may decline just as quickly as they surged if a positive, hopeful message is offered to the Scottish people by a Federalist bloc that rejects equally the economic catastrophe of  Socialism and the economic catastrophe of Separatism. .   


Dan Falchikov said…
Well Ruth Davidson has won...
Cicero said…
Hmm... an audited result might show something different.
Newmania said…
. We are a radical free market party, that nonetheless believes in corporate social responsibility.

You really ought to inform, the Liberal Party of this fact down here. They are way left of Labour. There are lots of interesting things in this piece
1-Scottish currency - How would that actually work. You happily supported yoking Greece to Germany and I can`t see who is going to ask the question anyway?
2- I don`t see that a banks assets and the GDP of a country are related. The fact that we have been obliged to guarantee RBS as tax payers is, one hopes,a one off
3 - Isn`t it cake and eat it time again. You want to retain your say over England but become Lord and masters North of Hadrian's Wall.

Personally it makes me unhappy to see Scotland flip England the finger every day. I have been to a couple of England Scotland rugby games and found them to be a friendly rivalry and a reminder that not every Scot hates you on sight, although many (inexplicably )do.
I also do a lot of business with Scottish Companies and again I do not come across any anti English feeling

On the other hand it is clearly unsustainable for Scotland to inflict an unmodernised Labour Party on England and don`t forget that Labour are as dead South of Birmingham as Conservatives are in Scotland.
The phenomenon of regionalisation does not stop in chilly jocko land. The injustice perpetrated on the South , the only tax exporting region outside London is unreasonable.

Your answer is to chop England into bits as if it were less a country than Scotland. That aint happening matey, end of.

I think the best option is to reduce the Scottish MPs in Westminster .
JPJ2 said…
Forget it-your party is dead in Scotland though the corpse twitches unburied.

The English have not the slightest interest in federalism and I rarely hear a Scottish Lib Dem mention it-certainly no English Lib Dem ever does.
Cicero said…
JPJ2- you might want to take a look at the organization chart of the Liberal Democrats: you will see the whole constitution has been federal for decades- the Lib Dems are now and have always been a federal party. We have also been written off in Scotland before most of the elections that I have fought, and we are still here and still fighting for the things we believe in.
JPJ2 said…
Cicero-as you must surely know, I was writing about federation for the UK, not how the LibDems organise themselves.

Anyway, dream on about a LibDem recovery in Scotland if you must deceive yourself, but Rennie's approach, portraying his party as the third unionist party, is digging the grave for the unburied corpse I pointed to in my earlier reply.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

KamiKwasi brings an end to the illusion of Tory economic competence

After a long time, Politics seems to be getting interesting again, so I thought it might be time to restart my blog. With regard to this weeks mini budget, as with all budgets, there are two aspects: the economic and the political. The economic rationale for this package is questionable at best. The problems of the UK economy are structural. Productivity and investment are weak, infrastructure is under-invested and decaying. Small businesses are going to the wall and despite entrepreneurship being relatively strong in Britain, self-employment is increasingly unattractive. Red tape since Brexit has led to a significant fall in exports and the damage has been disproportionately on small businesses. Literally none of these problems are being addressed by this package. Even if the package were to stimulate some kind of short term consumption-led growth boom, this is unlikely to be sustainable, not least because what is being added on the fiscal side will be need to be offset, to a great de