Skip to main content

How the Liberal Democrats are recovering

I often find that returning to the UK for a rare visit is a rather sobering experience. The difficulties the government faces seem exposed in sharp relief when you have been away for a while.


This trip was a little different.


Yes, it is all to obvious that the physical infrastructure needs investment: but despite potential future problems, Crossrail is being built- and the tunnel portal, close to Paddington station is well underway. Above the ground, Heathrow's new terminal is also now taking shape, and flying over London, the Olympic stadium gleams above the winding river Lea. The giant Shard office building too is nearing completion. The pace of development is visibly quicker than last year, so for the time being at least, London is moving forward. The sense of depression that seemed all pervasive in the summer is also a little lighter.


For the first time in a while, I went to visit a friend who is a Member of Parliament. Indeed, he has become a Liberal Democrat minister in the coalition government. Before I meet him, I talk things over with my Uncle who is a very long serving Lib Dem MP. He reflects that the situation for the party is not beyond recovery, and that behind the scenes, some extraordinary progress is being made. I am sceptical, but I resolve to quiz my friend, who has emerged as one of the key ministers, when we meet later.


It was the day after the Conservatives had split dramatically over the perennial issue of "Europe". The atmosphere in the evening fug of the bars and tea rooms remains excited and it is clearly the leading topic of conversation. The kind of people who call the European Union the "EUSSR"- which as a resident of a country formerly occupied by the USSR, I find incredibly insulting and puerile- are much in evidence. Yet as my friend points out, the "antis" lost, and more to the point, the Prime Minister has even more reasons to be grateful to the Lib Dems and irritated with his Tory colleagues.


It is, he points out, something of a distraction anyway: there is a crisis in the Euro, but there is nothing positively specific that the "antis" can put forward: it is still a visceral and rather inchoate rage. Meanwhile, the Minister makes a key point: 


"This is the first time since the 1920's that Liberal ministers can put their policies into action. We may not get a second chance, indeed the polls tell us that we won't. While the Tories are content to wait until the next election, since they believe that will get a majority, we have no time to waste. The result is that we are enacting far more of our program than they are."


He added:


"We can now point to a solid block of genuinely Liberal achievements, particularly increasing the tax free allowance to £10,000, and while we have made mistakes- and how could we not have done, under such difficult circumstances?- we have genuinely worked for the national interest, even when it looks like our party interest will be overwhelmed"


So, far from the Lib Dem ministers being cowed by the dire polls, in fact they seem to have a real fire in their bellies. While it is clear that the local elections in May will probably continue to see a negative trend for the party, at least in Scotland, it strikes me that the Liberal element in the government may yet prove, by working for the country in a fairly selfless way,  that they can restore trust in the party.


Certainly, despite the discomfort that Labour caused the Tories in the Euro vote, there is no evidence that Labour themselves believe or even hope that they can break through in 2015, whatever the polls say today.


So, the Liberal Democrats, dismissed as irrelevant or worse, are actually achieving far more than the media is giving them credit for. Despite the problems of the country, I find myself heartened by the political courage of the party's ministers. Morale in the Parliamentary party is good, and as the polls show a slight improvement in the still dire standing of the Liberal Democrats, I find myself wondering whether the party, far from being punished in 2015, might not actually end up being rewarded for at least trying to do the right thing, in the face of near-Universal derision and contempt.  

Comments

Lord Blagger said…
Yes, it is all to obvious that the physical infrastructure needs investment: but despite potential future problems, Crossrail is being built- and the tunnel portal, close to Paddington station is well underway.

=================

Yep, and it will never make a profit.

Congratulations to the poor in Cornwall who will be paying so the rich can have subsidized travel and save 3 minutes on the commute.

We solute you suckers!
Cicero said…
With all due respect my Lord, Paris has six commuter lines, London, even after Crossrail will have two. and London is the larger city. The traffic congestion and the dangerously overloaded tube are not only degrading the environment, they are having a major negative economic impact. The investment underway is not going to improve the journey time by 3 minutes, it will be the difference between travelling and being able to make the journey at all. Starving London of necessary investment does not improve the situation in Cornwall: indeed choking the primary economic motor of the UK has a negative impact on Cornwall and everywhere else.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...