Skip to main content

I don't often agree with George Monbiot, but...

The press reaction to the events of the past few days has been to smear, to misrepresent and to outright lie. As George Monbiot points out in The Guardian today, journalists are now a lickspittle bunch of toadies for their society friends. The circle of journalists is so narrow that any independent thought is being crushed by an isolationist, very right wing groupthink.


As the Daily Mail comes out with some variation on Lib Dems support for Europe taxing your granny to give you cancer shock horror and the Daily Express continue to find some spurious excuse to print a picture of Diana, it is hard not to feel a burning anger at the injustice that allows these poltroons to get away with their schtick.


Of course the Lib Dems are right to feel that Cameron played to his Eurosceptic gallery rather than the national interest when he wielded a veto that could be ignored. However we also know, as does David Cameron, that if the UK is going to recover, then the Eurozone must recover- and restructure- too. How it does this is of critical importance to Britain, and refusing to even participate in the process is an abdication of responsibility that is not only unworthy, it is positively dangerous to the UK national interest.


However that does not leave "Merkozy" in the right. The fact is that Sarkozy may have overplayed his hand too, and yet he still has no guarantees that the Germans will yet do what is now necessary to free up the ECB to act directly and to provide funding for the EFSF. Germany may have claimed European oversight over member country's finances, but it is by no means clear that they are yet ready to sanction the release of liquidity that would persuade the market that the Euro can recover. So although the Brussels summit veto has served notice of the parting of the ways, in fact there remain many potential outcomes still in play.


The fact that Nick Clegg absented himself from the yah-boo fest of the House of Commons was probably wise, and the relatively measured way that David Cameron made his statement, "more in sorrow than in anger" has clearly helped to cool tempers. His insistence on continued European Union membership will have reassured the Liberal Democats, after the more rabid Europhobes launched their maximalist- and totally irresponsible- demands for withdrawal.


In Germany, the press too has wondered aloud whether the UK should not just leave the EU, but in today''s press there is a far more measured tone, and many German politicians are growing irritated with the grandstanding of "Merkozy"- especially the Sarkozy part- and reminding themselves that a German-British alliance would be more congenial in many ways.


So we are not where we were a week ago, but Nick Clegg has made his point- albeit to the universal derision of the gutter press. They may remain loud, but David Cameron has been forced to take more notice of his coalition partner than a bunch of Yah-Hoos in the press... even if they did go to the same schools as many of his friends.

Comments

David Dee said…
Our useless,powerless and pantomime PM now knows that the bounce that he received is fall less than that that Vague,once again,had convinced him.

He may also have found out that whilst he is stuck with Clegg bercause our useless,powerless and pantomime PM is so useless, powerless and pantomime that he cannot force a General election by his breaking up the coalition whilst Clegg can either attempt to form another government without the Nasty party or force a General election.!!

Clegg, if he took my advice would not wish to break up the coalition because,as you alluded to, he now holds the power and is in a stronger position to dilute Nasty Party policy.

The rug pulling can wait until Clegg has got a war that he can win (NHS,perhaps !!)

I believe that our Useless, powerless and pantomime PM went to watch his son play a mouse in a school play before he left to usse his veto.

He obviously was watching intently as he appears to have picked up some hints !!!

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...