Skip to main content

Euro storm hitting Russia harder

The Economist blog, Free Exchange reports the growing evidence that the Eurozone crisis is sucking capital out of the peripheral European economies. Here in Estonia, we are inside the Eurozone, but there is certainly some increasing anecdotal evidence that suggest that Russia is being hit increasingly badly.


Colleagues who work with Russian investors suggest that there is a serious liquidity problem and that Russian banks are facing a funding strike. The impact of the de facto collapse of the Bank of Moscow in July has underlined concerns about a large number of smaller banks in Russia. In Lithuania, Bankas Snoras a bank that was owned by Russians, with a large client focus there has been declared bankrupt, and there are growing concerns about similar institutions in the Baltic region.


The Russian government, in principle, has a healthy funding balance, because the higher oil prices of recent years have allowed the country's reserves to grow substantially. However there is the unquantified impact of both corruption and mismanagement across the economy. There is considerable evidence of a huge capital flight, with large sums leaving the country through various off shore structures and being deposited in Switzerland and the UK, so that is hard to verify the precise state of financial health of many institutions.


The pressure that is on Western banks to control what they do even in Eastern European countries that are members of the EU has been substantial, with the Austrian monetary authorities demanding that their banks retrench their activities substantially. For Russia the situation is even bleaker. The impact of the political coup de theatre  of the return of Vladimir Putin has eliminated any doubts about the undemocratic nature of the regime, and Western governments are in no hurry to support bank operations there.


If there has been a severe credit crunch inside the EU recently, it seems that what is happening in Russia is potentially much worse, and with the growing realization of a slow down in China and renewed recession in the West, the price of oil is looking a lot less perky. That in turn is putting pressure on the Russian budget, which had been scheduled to grow substantially, not least because of a sharp rise in defence spending. In short, there is some evidence that the Russian economy is a lot more stressed than its headline numbers would make you believe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...