Skip to main content

The Price of Jordan

Katie Price is something of a cultural phenomenon. She has distorted her body to turn herself into a brand: "Jordan". Her past as "glamour model" - there is a piece of newspeak for sordid pornographic model- has given her an entry into the basement of celebrity.

Since then, she has parlayed her fifteen minutes of fame into a certain ubiquity, and now even the so-called serious press in the UK feels obliged to report her affairs. The latest is the breakdown of her marriage to one-hit wonder himbo, Peter Andre. As the squabbling couple fight their battles on the pages of the newspapers, I feel increasingly repulsed.

The incredible immaturity that this hard boiled misfit shows is a truly disgusting example of the coarseness of modern Britain. Though apparently she sees herself as a role model, it is hard to believe that using your children as a weapon against their father is anything but the lowest form of behaviour.

After a while I ask myself what it says about our society that a woman with a pretty open house approach to her bedroom can be given such wealth and adulation. Does it say that she is a freak, and that few of us regard her lifestyle as anything but bizarre? Or does it actually say that many of us- at least those that buy the celebrity magazines- actually aspire to be like her? Perhaps she is right, she is a role model.

If so, it is a role model for a society which has extraordinarily low aspirations. Trashy ghost written novels, "glamour pictures" and self indulgence is not exactly a brilliant CV.

In any event it is our poverty of ambition that seems to be condemning Britain to the hard shoulder in the global race for progress. We should expect hard work, we should expect competence as the norm, we should aspire to be the very best that we can be.

Jordan is a symbol of failure- and the time has come to push her freak show out of the limelight.

Comments

Newmania said…
Bit of a prude aren`t you CS , don`t you like girls then ?
Cicero said…
Ha! I don't like artificial breasts. I am however quite keen on the real things...
Jingles said…
but artificial things are not the substitute of original one's.
Unknown said…
Do you know, I thought this was going to be an article about the country Jordan, another of your masterpieces on international affairs.

I'm no great fan of either Price or Andre, and I think they should both be slapped for what they're dragging those kids through. People can get divorced in a dignified manner. You don't have to turn it into a media circus.

However much I despair of the fact that young men and women see the sort of fame attained by Price and Andre was worth aspiring to, I am concerned at a disproportionate sense of disapproval at a woman who behaves in this way. There are plenty men out there who have an open door approach to their bedroom who don't attract as much vilification.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...