Skip to main content

A State of Independence

As Prime Minister Gordon Brown sits down at the end of the last speech he is likely to make to a Labour Party conference as Prime Minister, it seems fair to consider the legacy of dismal failure that he leaves behind, and how that legacy can be corrected.

The supposed sop to Liberal Democrat supporters of a referendum on an AV electoral system is a deeply cynical raspberry from a Labour Party that has had 12 years to change things... and failed to do so. Yet apart from these hackneyed gimmicks, there was nothing. Labour is finished as a force for government for the foreseeable future and it deserves the trouncing that it is about to receive.

The big winners of the years of Labour rule have been the entrenched interests in the public sector, whose pensions have been protected and whose budgets have been inflated- regardless of effectiveness. Failure has been rewarded with salaries that match or better anything on offer in the private sector. An intrusive and bullying class of Labour client bureaucrats has created an network of policies in which any criticism of the public sector unacceptable, no matter how egregious the waste and indeed corruption may be, into a kind of thoughtcrime. Even when confronted with actual crimes, those responsible are usually -at worst- sent into a comfortable early retirement.

Labour talks about "creating jobs", but these jobs serve only to create further dependency.

Where are the genuine creative entrepreneurs, whose enterprise can unlock British talent and send it successfully into the global market place? They are hobbled by an array of byzantine and intrusive regulations which literally make it impossible for our country to compete. Meanwhile the profoundly inflationary policies of "quantitative easing" are destroying the value of our currency. As the Pound falls below parity to the Euro and stays there, and as the AAA country rating comes under review with negative outlook, the fundamental basis of the British economy is in a crisis.

More and more investors and entrepreneurs are leaving the United Kingdom- myself included.

Enterprise is not a dirty word- instead of talking about the "jobs market", it is time to support the wish of many people in the UK to be their own boss- free of intervention from employer or- indeed- government.

Without such entrepreneurs the outlook for the United Kingdom is bleak indeed.

It is disgraceful that I must pay tens of thousands to simply comply with arbitrary and illogical regulation. If I employ someone in Britain I must now spend vast sums on National Insurance, not to mention an array of complicated and often contradictory legislation which covers anything from fire regulations, money laundering, financial regulation and on to "diversity training". I may leave nothing to common sense- all must comply with the full spectrum of legislation which amounts to tens of millions of words. To ensure total compliance with legislation requires a compliance officer- a full time job which does not add to the profitability of the firm whatsoever.

It is insane that I need to spend over £1000 every year simply to find out how much personal tax I must pay to the government. It is immoral that I should pay well over 70% of my total income to the state in taxation. Any profits my firm may make are also subject to a vast number of taxes and regulations.

For some time I have run my business from Tallinn with full compliance to their legislation. However the effective and innovative use of the Internet and simple and clear regulation means my costs in Tallinn are about 10% of those in London.

More to the point in Estonia I am not told by some public sector leech- as I was the other day- that my efforts to build my own business were "capitalist exploitation of society and probably immoral". That such nonsense can be said with a straight face is perhaps the most poisonous legacy of a administration that has done more than any other to undermine the freedom of citizens to work for themselves instead of for the government.

Comments

Liberal Eye said…
My brother, who runs a small business, tells of attending a small business conference two or three years ago at which one of the speakers was from the Health and Saftey Executive.

One of the points put to him from the floor after his talk was that there are so many regulations that even those who wanted to comply couldn't maintain the expertise to do so. Could there not, he asked, be a single official person as a 'one stop shop' point of contact?

Of course not, came the reply. No-one could possibly know all the rules and regulations.

Quite so!
Newmania said…
Fantastic I agree with every word of that. If there were lots of Liberals like you we could do business

One of your best
(Insert by now obligatory remark about you being in the wrong Party)

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...