Skip to main content

Wish fulfillment?

Ambrose Evans Pritchard, the business columnist of the Daily Telegraph has an agenda: he does not support the Euro.

Fair enough.

He writes a lot about the problems he sees with the currency

Also, fair enough.

His latest story on the subject is that Germans are now no longer accepting Euro notes with serial numbers that show that they are printed in Latin countries like Spain (prefix letter V) or Italy (prefix letter S), and are swapping these for notes with the German prefix X.

If true, then this is extremely serious, since it implies that German consumers might refuse to accept non-German notes and that would effectively end the currency union.

The trouble is, I can find no other reference to this behaviour anywhere. Wherever I have looked, the single reference for the story is the story itself and nothing else.

Has Evans Pritchard just printed a story that he would like to be true? If so he has committed the cardinal crime of any journalist.

He must give a source for this story, because the consequences are critical and I am not sure I believe him.

Evans Pritchard's credibility is on the line.

UPDATE: I have continued to look, and the only evidence has been anecdotal and can find no corroberation beyond what has been posted below for Ambrose Evans Pritchard's story.

If not total fiction, to print the story as Pritchard has done is highly misleading. It may be actionable under the false rumours section of the FSA.

I will not accept abusive posts- especially from Anonymous posters.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Credibility on the line?? You just need to follow the links in his wikipedia entry to his Clinton "reporting" to suspect he was always more conspiraloon than correspondent.
Nick said…
I can remember when the Euro was launched there was a story going round about a German city that had given it up and had gone back to using the Mark, but no one could ever say which actual city it was. This story seems to have been cut from the same cloth.
Anonymous said…
Could this be the source?

Not entirely sure (it's in German!), but it looks like it could be the report Pritchard is referring to.
Anonymous said…
Translated, the part of the linked article that suggests this:

"...Bankers report that here and there customers with an unusual desire come closer to it. When disbursements in cash they ask for notes with German land marking..."

Exaggerated by Pritchard, maybe. Fiction, no.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
Lemme see your homework diary, Cic. Ill help you out here:


The page.


The Google-translated page.


A Google search that will bring it right up, out of the box.


Accusing a professional jourmalist of fabrication is a serious business, sportsman. If I were you I'd retract, and pronto. Or I'd consult my solicitor.
Anonymous said…
I bought a sandwich in Dundalk about a year ago. The shopkeeper wouldn't take a Spanish Euro coin. I was in a hurry, and I kinda liked the idea anyway, so I just dug out an Irish one instead.
Anonymous said…
Further to Ian_qt and Thon Brocket, the Handelsblatt article says in the first line: "Es geht um eine kleine Minderheit. Man muss sie Exoten nennen." ie "This is about a small minority. They are best called exotic.". So, not sure this is a good basis on which to write a long article in the Evening Standard on how terrible things are with the Euro. Why are people picking on Spain, anyway? Spanish banks suffered the least in the crunch...

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Breaking the Brexit logjam

The fundamental problem of Brexit has not been that the UK voted to leave the European Union. The problem has been the fact that the vote was hijacked by ignorant, grandstanding fools who interpreted the vote as a will to sever all and every link between the UK and the European Union. That was then and is now a catastrophic policy. To default to WTO rules, when any member of the WTO could stop that policy was a recipe for the UK to be held hostage by any state with an act to grind against us. A crash out from the EU, without any structure to cope, was an act of recklessness that should disqualify anyone advocating it from any position of power whatsoever. That is now the most likely option because the Conservative leadership, abetted by the cowardly extremism of Corbyn, neither understood the scale of the crisis, now had any vision of how to tackle it. Theresa May is a weak and hapless Prime Minster, and her problems started when she failed to realize that there was a compromise that