Skip to main content


I know, I know... it went too far.

17 people were arrested, stations were closed, the already ho-hum weekend service on the tube was disrupted.

On the other hand, what a party!

Tens of thousands of people came out to drink on the London tube. The occasion being the first act of the new mayor, Boris, which was to ban drinking on the tube. I got caught up on my way home. The first or the last coaches were filled with people. Some were in Black tie. Some were in Rugby shirts, some (after a couple of circuits on the Circle Line) has lost their shirts. Almost all were raucous, loud and cheerful. To a man- or more rarely,woman- it was **** Boris! Even though, I suspect, that a large number of them had voted for him.

So Why, then?

Not because it was about alcohol- though lets face it, the Brits have love/love relationship with the demon drink. Yet I'll wager that very few out last night had ever drunk on the tube before.

The issue is about freedom.

People are sick of being treated as though politicians are teachers and the rest of us are naughty schoolkids. So people smoke- as long as it harms no one else, so what? So people drink? We already have sufficient laws to deal with the drunk and disorderly, as the Police discovered several times last night.

Last night was a cheerful act of rebellion, and if a very small number took it too far, well that is unfortunate. On the other hand, the fact that people are prepared to give a cheerful two fingers to authority makes me feel quite optimistic about the future of this country.

If Boris has any sense, he will repeal this silly law, and then come out on the Circle Line with the rest of us to celebrate - oh, and a bar at Edgware Road station could be a real money spinner.


Anonymous said…
Cicero, across the street from Edgware Road Tube is San Miguel's. Fine Spanish restaurant, excellent paella, but good drinking spot. I've spent enough times stuck at Edgware Road to know...
Newmania said…
So people smoke- as long as it harms no one else, so what? So people drink? We already have sufficient laws to deal with the drunk and disorderly, as the Police discovered several times last night.

The Liberal Party have been in the forefront of promoting the no risk agenda and did nothing to help on smoking , hunting or any other real Libertarian issue I can think of. They will soon be clucking about the passive damage drinking does and to suddenly want to be on the side of individual freedom rings very hollow indeed.
In London there is problem of fear in Public spaces and while the Mayor cannot solve it he can set the tone . This fear is real and not imaginary nannying nonsense that has lead to the destruction of the Pub following the busy bodying and loathed smoking bann you supported and Boris would like to ameliorate in London. If you have ever been caught up in a gang of aggressive thugs on tube you would know what I mean and this measure is overwhelmingly supported.
Boris has along record of speaking out about Liberty and paid the price for socalled political incorrectness . Furthermore the fact that a couple of hundred people got drunk and it is front page news if it anything shows the absurdly Metropolitian bias of the media . 10000 marched to protest about the third runway on that weekend and were ignored .

‘On the other hand, the fact that people are prepared to give a cheerful two fingers to authority makes me feel quite optimistic about the future of this country.’
I cannot imagine why when the Liberal party have supported the extension of the state with all the loss of freedom that involves together with the removal of accountable democracy to some unknown European venue and increased taxes throughout the nineties ( Recent Tory stolen clothes to be ignored). I have never met any Liberal capable of sticking two fingers up at Andy Pandy without checking with the appropriate authorities.

Pah , back in your box Cicero.
Cicero said…
Newmania- as usual you listen to your own predjudices and not the argument. Don't you think it is just a bit arrogant to tell people what they beleive rather than listening to what they are saying.
Anonymous said…
I'm sorry, drinking and smoking are different. As a non-smoker, my rights are always infringed by idiots who have a lit cigarette, takes maybe 2 puffs, and just lets them burn. I end up getting more of the bloody smoke than the smoker.

Liberalism is for freedoms -- but it also has to protect the freedoms of the abstainers.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo