Skip to main content

EU turn

The FT reports on the sharp rise in support for the limitation of the powers of the European Union- even amongst traditionally strong supporters of the bloc.

The context is interesting- the suggestion is that the backlash against the EU is coming as a result of the rapid growth of immigration. The rise of immigration has indeed been rapid, and there is obviously generally pretty limited support for expanding the rights of free movement to the citizens of Bulgaria and Romania. Yet the majority of immigrant attacks are not made against EU migrants but against those coming from the Arab World, the sub continent and sub-Saharan Africa.

To my mind, the issue of immigration is a kind of referred pain: discontent is far more entrenched than merely a right-wing backlash against immigration. The creation of giant government-lead projects, such as EU funded rail construction, is a symptom of a Brussels elite which is seeking to buy the support of the voters. Yet the elite is very isolated and as a result consistently hits the wrong note. Spiffy infrastructure funding looks more like pork-barrel politics when you move beyond the European quarter of Brussels. Whizzy initiatives lose their sparkle when we note how the last grand projet - the creation of the Euro- turned out.

The fact is that the EU clientele has lost its way. The idea of ever closer union has been buried for at least a decade by the economic shocks post-2008. They fear the loss of momentum that puts the creation of a single EU economic and political space at risk. Yet that fear is itself putting the EU into reverse. The point about the functionalist EU was that it sought to create practical agenda for integration, which was to be a lasting and mutual benefit to all the members. The fact is that the current system works to the benefit of Germany and not to the PIIGS, and the sense of injustice that this has created is undermining support for the Union across all member states.

The next EU elections will doubtless see a big upsurge in anti-EU groups, from UKIP and the True Finns in the North to Le Front National and the PVV in the West. Yet the fact is that the voters will give such support because they know that in the great scheme of things it doesn't matter much- and that is a measure of the failure of the Brussels political class: despite all the political influence and investment clout they can wield, they still don't matter to most voters.

It is not the hatred of the voters that the EU needs to be most afraid of- although that is growing- it is the sense of impotence and irrelevance that the EC still has in the eyes of most EU citizens, even compared to image of the national governments. That is a problem that will not go away, and the current thinking in Brussels- all free spending pork and no civic authority- will not address that crisis in the slightest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo