Skip to main content

Outside the conference hall...

The media narrative of the Liberal Democrats at conference setting themselves up against the "evil" Tories is not one that I find particularly inspiring, even if it makes for tub thumping speeches and generates a bit more coverage for the party. 

In fact it is a distraction.

Vince Cable is wasted as the anti Tory shibboleth, when it is his economics prowess that is now most needed in order to analyse the growth implosion outside the conference hall. Yesterday's downgrade of Italy looks to me like the beginning of the end of the financial system as we have known it for some twenty or thirty years. The political paralysis across the European Union is now not only threatening the existence of the Euro, but of the European Union itself.
The breakdown of the EU would be an economic and political catastrophe for the UK.

While infantile Conservatives rub their hands with glee, they fail to see the unfolding disaster in Britain. Our markets, our trade, our very livelihood depends on Europe, and a catastrophic meltdown of currency and the wider system, far from being the "liberation" that the more right wing Tories believe, has the potential to become a bigger economic shock than the great depression- with incalculable and permanent impact on the UK- even leading to the break up of our country.

Vince Cable is one of the commentators who got the crisis right, and his solutions are among the most nuanced and thoughtful. Although he is right to trumpet his victory over Tories in the Murdoch affair, it is his economic analysis that we could most do with right now.

I do not buy the idea that splitting "good", that is high street, banks from "bad", that is "casino" banks is on its own sufficient safeguard- the fact is that the crisis has its root in bad lending- basic mortgage lending- that was only made worse by the bundling of such dross into more complicated securities. The original failure was a basic bank failure and not an investment bank failure, albeit that investment banks made a poor situation into a critical one.

While I welcome the current ideas on bank reform, the fact is that the UK faces the immediate crisis with a far bigger structural deficit than we knew, and it faces the potential for a critical breakdown in trade and finance flows.

We need to be addressing this crisis with far more urgency: the fact is that much that is going on inside the conference hall in Birmingham will be irrelevant, pretty soon, unless we can understand and get to grips with the economic crisis.

Vince Cable has been a good lookout, but the country is still headed towards the iceberg- as Italy pays the price for its failures of political and economic leadership, we must make sure that the UK does not go the same way.

How we address that is what I want to hear from the party leadership: it could hardly be more topical or relevant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...