Skip to main content

Believing the polls

If we believe the final polls before today's votes, then the UK may look rather different tomorrow.

If we believe the polls, the Liberal Democrats will receive a pasting: set to lose up to half their seats on Scotland and several hundred council seats across the country, the party may also be facing a major setback in its quest for British political reform, with the rejection of the AV voting system. Many journalists are forecasting a party in meltdown, with early leadership challenges coming to Nick Clegg.

If we believe the polls. the the SNP is set to win close to an outright majority at Holyrood, which will finally give them the opportunity to stage their own referendum on whether of not Scottish separatism should break up the UK.

I am not sure how much we should believe the polls, or in any event I am not sure about the message that they convey. I think that the Liberal Democrats will take some heavy punishment, and I am braced for some sad results, yet in fact the party has actually recovered a little from the nadir of 11%, if we believe the polls. In fact I hear reports from across the country that the campaign has gone well, and that far from being disheartened and divided, there is a mood of grim determination. Far from May 5th being the beginning of the end of the Liberal Democrats, I think the story may become that in the face of extremely adverse circumstances, the party turns out to be more resilient than was predicted, and more resilient than our political enemies- both inside and outside the coalition- hope.

The fly in the ointment though would be the failure to get a change to our absurd electoral system. The conservatives- both Labour and Tory- will say that the rejection of AV would mean that the British people do not support any change to the electoral system. This is a position that the Liberal Democrats will- and must- reject. While the process of electoral change will now move to the reform of the House of Lords, which the coalition agreement frames as a largely or wholly elected body, selected by a proportional voting system. No referendum is mandated for this change, and it will be more vital than ever that it is completed before the end of this Parliament. In the end though, despite the fact that the commentariat will insist that the project for electoral reform is dead, the party must redouble its efforts to put the case for a more open political system, including comprehensive electoral reform. In my view the various electoral systems we currently use- including AV at Scottish local by-elections incidentally- should be rationalised into the best system, and that system is a single transferable vote in multi-member constituencies. The cynicism of Gordon Brown led to the side track of AV: we must not get fooled again.

So as we vote today, I am braced for a poor showing for my party, but I am also hopeful that we will also pull off one or two surprises on an otherwise gloomy night. I think we will do a lot better than our national poll rating shows at present, I do not think that the party will go into meltdown, or anything like it. We are a party that has grown inured to adversity and we will be able to cope.

For those of us who joined the Liberal Party- in my case over thirty years ago- well, we have seen many ups and downs. We have even seen a time, just after the merger, when the party support could barely be measured statistically at all. So, we really have stared a meltdown in the face and we know what it looks like.

Even if we do believe the polls, the Liberal Democrats will still be fighting for our Liberal beliefs on Friday.

Even if we do believe the polls, the Liberal Democrats will still be in government on Friday.

Even if we do believe the polls, the Liberal Democrats can most definitely recover and rebuild.

Of course the shock of the evening may not be the Liberal Democrats at all, after all the expectations of the media for them could hardly be lower. On the other hand, a poor result for Labour is not in the media script, and that could leave the Lib Dems very well placed indeed for a recovery that seems beyond all hope today.

Beyond all hope that is, if we believe the polls.

Comments

Newmania said…
I do not agree with you about AV but I would not be overly concerned about the Polls. If you thought you could be centre and far left in government then you were always going to be disappointed.
I am not precisely sure what values you think you have that are Liberal as opposed to my presumably illiberal ones and I struggle to see how such a thin sliver of difference justifies a whole Party of the centre right.
Laws,Clegg and others would be welcome as Conservatives.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...