Skip to main content

Ruin in a Nation

"There is a great deal of ruin in a nation"- Adam Smith

Returning to the UK, I see the familiar streets subtly changed by the passing of the seasons. The electoral season is, of course almost with us- the general assumption being- hopefully- that Mr. Brown will go to the Queen to request a dissolution on Tuesday, for a general election on May 6th.
The past week has seem a slew of improving economic numbers: in particular a sharp recovery in manufacturing, exports and GDP growth. Some of these numbers are more in line with what expectations were in November, before a run of truly awful figures caused me- amongst others- to revise down their forecasts. The huge depreciation in the currency does finally seem to be having an effect. Nevertheless the economic outlook is uncertain and unstable at best. Even if we have indeed turned the corner on the last two years of economic recession, the impact of the gigantic increase in debt that we have taken on will be felt for decades. In the markets, UK debt is trading at levels that already imply a ratings downgrade, and the country will need to make cuts of tens of billions of Pounds in annual expenditure over the coming years in order to balance the books.
At the top of most politicians lists will be axing infrastructure projects- such as HS2- which get the books to balance in the short term, but whose absence which will lead to the further erosion of British competitiveness in the long term. When it is quicker to get from Warsaw to, say, Frankfurt by high speed train than from Leeds, then Warsaw will be a more attractive investment destination.
What the crisis may have revealed, though, is not just the weakness of the economic infrastructure of the UK, but the weakness of its political infrastructure. There was much discussion of the decline of British manufacturing and the rise of the City. Generally both trends were welcomed by the political leaders. However it is when we examine the astonishing centralisation of political power in the UK, that we can see inefficiency and bottlenecks. The right of the Prime Minister to call an election at a time that suits him is something that is anti-democratic, yet I wonder whether David Cameron- still less Gordon Brown- is prepared to give it up? The rights and the perquisites of the Royal prerogative that have devolved onto the Prime Minister are handy tools once one is in office- no matter how angry one might have been about them when in opposition. It is only the Liberal Democrats who have argued consistently and as a matter of manifesto commitment for their total abolition, as part of a full programme of constitutional reform.
As we contemplated the blooming of rosettes and Garden Posters over the next few weeks, I suspect that an inconclusive election may finally move the political focus onto the major problems of our constitution.
Like the spring this year, and the election season itself, it seems long overdue.


Newmania said…
I adore the electoral ‘season’ conceit, and 'blooming rosettes' was particularly delightful.
I ‘m not sure that the right to time an election would solve as many problems as you seem to imagine . The demand boost we are currently enjoying is timed to coincide with the election and would be whenever it was . At a time when the Labour are implausibly worried about funding niceties over NI we are continuing to borrow largely to continue to fund the ”inefficiencies “ all Parties are claiming exist. This topsy turvy world is created by the election and the whole caravan would simply move along. Even this would have advantages though.

On the Lib Dem side I am somewhat frustrated at the Party adopting the position Conservatives would like (ie reducing the deficit by 100% cuts ) without any clue as to how or any sign of the gumption required to deliver such a fantasy programme. Still , it is , in my view the proper aspiration.

I thought this might cheer you. If you look at Mike Smithsons Polling site he has a comparison between now and 97. The growth of the Lib Dems from 10/11 to 19/20 (%) is striking and if you go back to the days of Thorpe even more so . I begin to think we may be on the edge of one of the peridoc shake ups which may well see Liberals replacing Labour as opposition .Or the fifth Lib Lab pact….

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo