Skip to main content

The Rollercoaster Ride of the Pound

I must admit I am feeling a bit smug: I anticipated that the UK inflation numbers would be worse than expected and as a result delayed transferring my cash off shore. The numbers are so bad though, that my long position in Sterling may be only needed for a few months.

Some may ask themselves why such bad news would cause the Pound to go up. The answer is all about interest rates. The market is increasingly anticipating that the Bank of England will have to raise interest rates substantially in order to deal with an inflation rate that is already headed to the top of its supposed permissible range. Is this good news? Very obviously not: the costs of borrowing for British companies and households is going to rise substantially, and probably very rapidly. On the other hand if the Bank fails to act quickly enough, then inflation could really take a hold: with equally dire consequences for the UK cost of living. Yet the UK economy remains in a highly fragile state, large rises in interest rates could kill off the tentative recovery before it even starts. The Bank of England is damned if it acts too rapidly, but equally damned if it acts too slowly.

Goldman Sachs put out a very optimistic report on the UK economy only this morning, saying that the 25% fall in Sterling over the past 18 months would boost the economy dramatically. The problem is that the UK economy is now largely public sector services- precisely the area where there is the least currency effect. Manufacturing output is only 9% of GDP: it is too small to have a real impact on the growth of the economy. In fact the fall in the currency is highly inflationary given the massive trade gap between the giant import and puny export numbers- and invisible earnings have been badly hurt by the disproportionate British investment in the USA whose currency has also depreciated versus the Eurozone where it has appreciated.

Goldman Sachs of course will be seeking to place a record amount of Gilts onto the market later in the year, though naturally it would be cynical to suggest that their consistently bullish view of the UK is linked to the huge fees that they gain from doing business with its government and monetary authorities.

For what its worth, my view of the British economy in 2010 is that this months inflation figures will be followed by even worse (indeed record monthly) figures next month. There may even need to be an emergency rate rise as early as March. That rise will need to be at least 100 basis points, possibly 150, and will be followed by several other rises in quick succession. This will be particularly true if the polls continue to point to a hung Parliament after the general election. Unemployment, meanwhile, will rise sharply too: the classic stagflation mixture. If demand for the big Gilt auctions later in the year is low and the cuts proposed by any new government are unconvincing then both the UK triple-A and Sterling will come under renewed pressure. Rates will have to rise substantially, particularly bearing in mind that the average base rate since the Bank of England was founded is 5%. Eventually the highly overvalued UK housing and corporate real estate markets will have to capitulate. This in turn may place renewed pressure on the banking system. I would not bet against rates above 6% before the year end.

As for Sterling: in a word: volatility. As the interest rate cycle tightens rapidly, I think it could peak at somewhere around €1.30. However the election, gilt auctions and need for recession inducing government cuts, not to mention looming pressure on the credit rating makes me think that it will test parity again before the year is out.

We will see if I am so smug in June, which is when I hope to have cut my long Sterling position to a short one.


Ian Thorpe said…
Inflation was the inevitable consequence of QE and the unsupportable level of debt being taken on by the government. But as we are already well on the way to a jobless economy how do we recover.

Unless we become a low cost workshop for the Chinese, a European Hong Kong I can't see any way out of this mess for Britain.
Newmania said…
Ahem you are not alone in foreseeing inflation and interest rate rises . Ultimately this is a result of creating a structural fiscal imbalance that the Liberal Party agitated for more of through out its foolish Genesis

I am not at all sure a dose of inflation is not the least worst course open to us though

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo