Skip to main content

PBR?!.... RIP!

The Pre-Budget Review in the UK is a fiasco.

The policy measures announced are either pointless- the change in the Bingo levy, for goodness sakes- or dangerous- the increase in National Insurance. There is much rhetoric about cuts, no actual delivery. Even the "Banker's Bonus Tax" will raise nothing, and, by the way, similar measures were abandoned in both France and Germany (neither exactly "the Bankers Friend"), because they were thought to be unconstitutional. Taxes are supposed to be levied on the general population, if you start levying specific taxes, how long can it be before they become arbitrary, populist attacks on the chosen "people's enemy" of the day. Oh, wait a minute...

The real terror of this PBR, however, is in the detailed numbers on the economy.

When the UK stayed unexpectedly in recession last quarter, we were told that this was probably just "technical", and that the economy would be shown to have actually emerged from recession with later revisions of the numbers. What Mr. Darling's announcements show is that despite all of the huge increases in liquidity, the UK is still in recession- and one that is deeper than we had previously thought. Meanwhile, as my friend Mark Bathgate notes in the Spectator Coffee House blog, the debt numbers that were announced were not the complete picture. Mr. Darling suggested that the ultimate cost of the bank bail-out would be only around £10 billion- which looks like pure wishful thinking in the face of the hundreds of billions that have -so far- been required to prop up the system. The announced debt numbers are therefore based on a pinch of fairy dust rather than any realistic assessment of the crisis.

The determination of the government to hand out a few paltry goodies to their core voters is simply contemptible. The crisis is so severe that Draconian cuts across the board are going to have to be made. Of course that is before we take into account the unfunded public sector pension liabilities that already total 50% of GDP. There is no comfort zone, no safety, anywhere in the UK economy.

Over the past four years, this blog has discussed the approaching economic crisis. Now, I fear that over the course of the next six months, London is set to become ground zero of a fundamental, systemic challenge that will blow away any remaining illusions about the staggering decline of the United Kingdom. From the first and largest economy in the world we may well have fallen to somewhere in the teens before this next decade is out.

The chickens are coming home to roost: taking soft options, imposing little or no financial discipline, turning a blind eye to incompetence, the greed of speculators, poor industrial management, Kremlin funded trade unions, civil servants building empires that would make "Sir Humphrey" blush, all have had their part to play in this sorry tale of decline.

The blame, though, will fall upon those who tempted the Gods by declaring "an end to boom and bust", and who by taxing pension savings ensured that prudence was never their real watch word. As Tony Blair collects some further five figure speaking fee, he may reflect that he sowed the wind, but his country is set to reap the whirlwind.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Well its all cheer this morning.
Dave B said…
It seems the banker tax is entirely fictional.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/pbr/article6951011.ece
Newmania said…
It is probably churlsih when you have written such a superb post but I have to point out that the Liberal party advocated higher speding and higher taxes thoughout the period the systemic defacit wass built up.
The only people who got it right were the Conservative Party and their ignored and derided warnings now read like works of al;most spooky pre-cognition

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...