Skip to main content

Boom and Bluster

As the impact of the financial storm in the US sinks in, there may be some surprising losers. Not so much the "masters of the Universe", since they know full well that with high rewards come high risks, but some who arrogantly believed themselves immune to the storms of the financial markets.

Six weeks ago, Russia was basking in the warm economic climes caused by a massive surge in the price of oil and other commodities. Though their balance sheet was relatively small, they believed that the biggest problem that they had to face was the inflationary risks of so much money coming into their economy. The liquid reserves would allow them to weather any storm.

Since then we have seen the BP TNK mess underline the real risks that even one of the largest and most powerful global corporations face when dealing with the crooked and opaque business world of the Silovik state. We have seen aggressive comments by Vladimir Putin about the running of Mechel undermine confidence still further.

Then came Georgia.

The contempt for international law and the extent of Russian aggression and the extremely intemperate language of the Siloviki was the political last straw for the international system. The US has now marked Russia ans a potential threat and will no longer deal with it except on those terms. The European Union, aware that the Russians are apt to use gas supply as a weapon has not put forward overt sanctions, but has also concluded that Putin is not a man that we could really do business with.

However, the economic impact of the Russian attack is now set to be felt in full.

The international markets, facing serious problems across the board is not willing even to look at Russia unless a major risk premium is applied. In some cases the markets will not supply capital at any price. The market for second-tier Russian banks is closed. This is a problem, since several of them are now urgently seeking capital. It seems likely that there will be Russian banks that will be caught up in the current financial crisis, and several secondary banks will not survive.

Meanwhile the price of oil has unexpectedly fallen very sharply, as I write, Brent Spot is down to $ 87. Though Russia is still making money at that level, the revenues to the Russian treasury will be sharply reduced, and as the global slow down continues, there seems little chance that the oil price can make a dramatic recovery.

Russia is politically isolated, but the market impact of Russian aggression is already much more serious. Already at least $8 billion of reserves have been needed to deal with the market volatility, and as further international investors try to get their money out of Russia the market rout grows ever deeper. The exchanges are down about 40% since the summer and the interbank markets are reaching levels not seen for four years.

There is a price for Russian risk, but, investors have concluded, it is not this price.

As Putin and Medvedev continue with another bout of willy waving: defiant in the face of near universal condemnation of their actions, they do not seem to notice that they are increasingly naked to the markets. At a time when there is a flight to quality, an unstable, corrupt, opaque and potentially hostile power is not the place that international investors want to be- and some of them will sell at any price, just to get out.

Though the Siloviks believe that their reserves can be used to insulate themselves from these problems, the fact is that they risk their credit rating if they do this. The blustering and arrogant Siloviki are caught between a rock and the hard markets. Politically the Siloviks may have got off lightly, but the markets seem set to punish the Russian regime to the maximum extent.

A secondary banking collapse in Russia might remind even the Siloviki that it is better to be polite, even to those you consider your enemies, because you might just need their help one day. In the end sending the Peter the Great to Venezuela will look like the act of hubris that it is- and the blustering of the Siloviks may diminish to the point where they have to face some hard realities.

Turmoil in New York may lead to real crisis in Moscow.

UPDATE: Trading in Moscow was suspended this afternoon after a further 18% fall.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The market succeeds where politicans fail.

It has acted, as it both proper and prudent, to penalize Russia for aggression.

Our body politic has not.

It is I suspect the case that all or almost all politicians are compromised in such a way that the actions which are best for them are not the actions which are best for the people they represent.

The market as a whole does not fact this problem, for it requires convincing innumerable individual wills to act in a way which is not in their best interest.
Mark Wadsworth said…
Fair do's.

Let's not forget the mess that the Russians caused in the late 1990s by defaulting on their bonds. They haven't been trusted since.

The beauty of all this retaliation is that it does not need coordinated action by the UN or the EU or NATO or other such organisations. It just happens.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...