Skip to main content

Market Solutions

As the credit market continues to tighten, it is clear that major ramifications are already underway. Despite the fact that too many political figures insist that they can do a better job by regulating, in fact the market has a habit of being able to fix its own problems.

Ferrovial, who bought BAA a year and a half ago, are now finding their large debt burden hitting their profits severely.

However, there is a solution: they can simply sell assets.

From the point of view of the consumer, this would be good news. The lack of competition has led to inefficient use of the airports around London. The poor transport links to Heathrow has allowed the BAA owned Heathrow Express to become the most expensive train ride per mile in the world, yet passengers transferring between different London Airports must do so by either coming into London by train, or taking a bus or taxi directly- there is no direct train link.

Breaking up the monopoly would force competition and help to address the costs and the access problems. The invisible hand strikes again!


Jock Coats said…
Yeah - but they should also have to pay for the airspace they use (LVT). That would concentrate minds a bit I expect!
Newmania said…
I like this post and I sort of like the previous one in spirit at least .

Sadly you are a member of Party who want to raise taxes , expand the state and export decision making to unaccountable foreigners.Furthermore it is well known that you will support Brown and thereby inflict more of the crushing authotitarian state we are already suffering under. I think you want to be economically free market and socially Liberal.
You would be far more at home in the Conservative party.

I know plenty of Liberals and they have are all," Something -must -be -done" people .Always will be .
Cicero said…
Jock- yes it would- and LVT as you know is something I support.

Newmania- I have been a member of the Liberals and the Liberal Democrats since 1979. As you may have guessed one member of my family is a Lib Dem MP, and I am friendly with several others. When I put forward my ideas, I am not a voice crying in the wilderness, I would say that I am in the mainstream of my party. I am socially and economically Liberal- that is why I am politically a Liberal Democrat.
Newmania said…
You must know most of the Parliamentary Party then :)

Then the entire Party could join the Conservative Party then which easily accomodates such views and tolerates difference with good humour anyway.Bits and bobs aside its about the role and scope of the state and if you are on our side you cannot , as Clegg has said he may , support Brown.

Such a position is a farce
Cicero said…
Nice try! However, Tory Love bombs don't alter the fact that the socially conservative element is top dog: Cornerstone alone off sets the few Liberal individuals amongst the Consevatives...

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo