Skip to main content

Gordon Brown: the seeds of his own downfall

As the reverberations from the Northern Rock debacle continue to echo, and as the evidence grows for a major fallout from the growing US Dollar crisis- one major casualty emerges: the credibility of the independence of the British Central Bank.

The first act of Brown as Chancellor was to grant the Bank of England independence. one of the first acts of Brown as Prime Minister is to demonstrate that the Bank is in fact not independent at all.

The political fallout of Northern Rock placed the Governor, Mervyn King under some pressure to resign, but even more pressure to change his policy of limiting support to lenders who get into trouble. The Governor's long held view is that to provide generous credit terms to banks that get into trouble would eliminate moral hazard and therefore encourage banks to take even greater risks.

More importantly still, the wash of extra money would add to inflationary pressures in the economy.

None of this seems to have counted with the UK Treasury- they have insisted on an all encompassing state guarantee for the Northern Rock depositors- such that remain- and have railroaded the Bank of England into giving their consent.

The next crisis will doubtless leave the independence of the Central Bank looking even more threadbare. In the meantime, despite the economic success claimed by Gordon Brown, the fact is that British interest rates have continued to be consistently higher than our European counterparts in the Eurozone. In the past few years the Sterling premium has allowed British financial system to take advantage of the "carry trade", and borrow in cheaper currencies now, however, even the premium has not been enough, and liquidity in Sterling has vanished.

In such a crisis, it is critical that the Central Bank has credibility. Unfortunately, by undermining this credibility, Gordon Brown has created a moral hazard for his own government: it is now expected that he would underwrite large parts of the banking system, and if he does not, then even greater volatility could result. Meanwhile, there are substantial inflationary pressures in the economy that imply a necessary brake on lending.

As the growing fallout of the Dollar crisis shows: there is now a real risk that the UK could join the US on the road to 1970's style "stag-flation". As in the early 1970s, the US is headed by a discredited administration, deeply embroiled in a disastrous land war in Asia. The difference now is that the US is not the world's creditor, but its debtor. The UK, as one of the largest investors in US business, has already lost billions as the value of those investments, measured in Sterling, diminishes. Yet our competitiveness versus the rest of the EU is also falling, as the supply of cheap and high quality labour from Central Europe now dries up.

These inflationary risks remain, yet the risk of a slowdown, based on falling house prices, has now risen dramatically. Brown may have already laid the seeds of his own downfall, by reversing the one single policy that Liberal Democrats could support whole-heartedly: an independent Central Bank.


Anonymous said…
I'm no Labour supporter but didn't Mervyn King say `no` to a question to him asking whether political pressure was put on him.
Tristan said…
ah, but what about political pressure to deny political pressure?
Martin Veart said…
I'm rather torn on Mervyn King. Sure, he got a hard time in front of the select committee but he did make the valid point that his hands were tied by recent legislation. Before it was introduced the Bank of England could have provided behind the scenes help to Northern Rock without public knowledge; thus preventing the understandable panic that followed when, because the Bank's hands were tied, the loan facility was made public.

I don't think the personnel at the Bank of England conducted themselves with any great success in the recent crisis but it is clear to me that the main fault is not the individuals but rather the current system.

Remind me who put that in place....? Ah yes. Gordon Brown.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

KamiKwasi brings an end to the illusion of Tory economic competence

After a long time, Politics seems to be getting interesting again, so I thought it might be time to restart my blog. With regard to this weeks mini budget, as with all budgets, there are two aspects: the economic and the political. The economic rationale for this package is questionable at best. The problems of the UK economy are structural. Productivity and investment are weak, infrastructure is under-invested and decaying. Small businesses are going to the wall and despite entrepreneurship being relatively strong in Britain, self-employment is increasingly unattractive. Red tape since Brexit has led to a significant fall in exports and the damage has been disproportionately on small businesses. Literally none of these problems are being addressed by this package. Even if the package were to stimulate some kind of short term consumption-led growth boom, this is unlikely to be sustainable, not least because what is being added on the fiscal side will be need to be offset, to a great de