Skip to main content

Transparency

Every year Transparency International release their index of corruption perceptions.

For a student of freedom this index is a very interesting read- it reminds you that governments can be thieves as well as enablers, and that there is no such thing as a perfect government. It also reminds us that the more corrupt a society, the poorer it tends to be.

The tragic list, this year is headed by Haiti- little raised in misery since the time that Graham Greene wrote about it in "The Comedians".

From the Central European perspective is the marked improvement of Latvia and Lithuania- the Baltic bloc is now clearly a cut above the rest of Central and Eastern Europe. However Bulgaria too has improved sharply- overtaking Poland.

As for the UK, its fall reflects the steady decay of good government under our hobbled constitution.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
The UK's fall?

Well I followed your link and we're 11th, with a score of 8.6. The site also has the 2004 table and then we were 11th with 8.6.

We're the highest placed 'big' European country, higher than France, Germany and the USA.

I don't think this is a result the UK should be embaressed about, quite the opposite.
7:04 pm
Anonymous said…
We were 11th with a score of 8.6 in 2005 as well. We seem to be holding steady, much to my surprise.

But why should a larger country be excused for being more corrupt than the Scandinavian countries? Doesn't that suggest that centralised power might therefore a bad thing, and more devolution will produce a dividend in terms of reducing corruption?
10:29 pm
Cicero said…
Quite Right, I misread the 2005 chart. However I would not be too complacent- my point about the imperfections of the UK still stands.
10:52 am
Anonymous said…
I don't know if there is research to back this up but I'd guess that the bigger and the richer the country is the easier it is for corruption to go unchecked. There will, definitially, be more money flying around. It cannot be a coincidence that so many of the top performers are small countries. What is the methodology for the analysis? Perhaps there is a clue there.

I think we score well in this chart but I agree that we should be aiming higher and matching our Scandinavian neighbours.
7:24 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and ...
1 comment
Read more

The Will of the People

Many of the most criminal political minds of the past generations have claimed to be an expression of the "will of the people"... The will of the people, that is, as interpreted by themselves. Most authoritarian rulers: Napoleon III, Mussolini, Hitler, have called referendums in order to claim some spurious popular support for the actions they had already determined upon. The problem with the June 2016 European Union was that the question was actually insufficiently clear. To leave the EU was actually a vast set of choices, not one specific choice. Danial Hannan, once of faces of Vote Leave was quite clear that leaving the EU did NOT mean leaving the Single Market:    “There is a free trade zone stretching all the way from Iceland to the Russian border. We will still be part of it after we Vote Leave.” He declared: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.” The problem was that this relatively moderate position was almost immediately ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more