Skip to main content

Unlucky politics

After the Conservative flirtation with mag-lev trains, perhaps we should not be surprised that a crash in Germany has killed at least 15 people.

Their support for Mag-lev, always looked like a gimmick- now it seems positively ill-judged


Will said…
Much as I hate to undermine a case against the Tories, if we rejected every mode of transport less than 100% safe, we would never leave home.
Etzel Pangloss said…
That was swift you to condemn the mag-lev. Is it because the tories flirted with the idea, it's very expensive or that you believe the technology is inherently dodgy?
Anonymous said…
Oh Cicero, if we had your way we'd be back to the chariots... MagLev is the way of the future. Remember how many crashes there were of various other transport advances -- like the airplane? The automobile? And do read the story -- the crash was not caused by a failure in MagLev technology, it was an obstruction on the rails. If anything it's a failure of the sensory aspects. I'd be more worried on the bloody DLR after this.
Cicero said…
It is expensive and the technology is unproven.

Far rather extend the high speedlines from London to the north and west- lines that can connect with the tunnel and the rest of Europe than waste time an an unproven gimmick.
Bishop Hill said…
The way I read the report, the crash was caused by a collision with a maintenance wagon. Presumably this is nothing to with the propulsion system used, but rather is a signalling problem. Certainly they seem to be saying that the cause was human error rather than a technical fault.

I agree that it's an expensive gimmick though.
Etzel Pangloss said…
The locomotive was cosidered to be an expensive gimmick by many. What's use a machine that would require the nation to be railed?

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

KamiKwasi brings an end to the illusion of Tory economic competence

After a long time, Politics seems to be getting interesting again, so I thought it might be time to restart my blog. With regard to this weeks mini budget, as with all budgets, there are two aspects: the economic and the political. The economic rationale for this package is questionable at best. The problems of the UK economy are structural. Productivity and investment are weak, infrastructure is under-invested and decaying. Small businesses are going to the wall and despite entrepreneurship being relatively strong in Britain, self-employment is increasingly unattractive. Red tape since Brexit has led to a significant fall in exports and the damage has been disproportionately on small businesses. Literally none of these problems are being addressed by this package. Even if the package were to stimulate some kind of short term consumption-led growth boom, this is unlikely to be sustainable, not least because what is being added on the fiscal side will be need to be offset, to a great de