Skip to main content

Od Warszawy

A sunny day in the Polish capital. As always, I marvel at the indomitable will that rebuilt this city from the utter ruin that the Nazis left. However, it is fair to say that the current political climate is less certain.

The provincial and insular politicians who currently form the bulk of the ruling PiS have now been joined by the Catholic Jihad faction ot the LPR-League of Polish families- although League of the Adams family might actually be more accurate. Meanwhile the cynical and aggressive Andrzej Lepper's "Self Defence" is in the unusual position of actually looking sophisticated- at least compared to the larger PiS. When you consider that Self Defence is trawling in the same waters as the BNP, this may give you a sense of how bad the current government looks.

Naturally, I am delighted that David Cameron regards these potato heads as his natural allies- he is trying to form a new alliance in the European Parliament to embrace the prickly Czech ODS and the naive and wooly PiS. Well, frankly: "Good Luck Mate!" the only thing that the PiS have going for them is that they are not outrageous crooks. This is good, but otherwise they have little to offer. Many of my friends shake their heads, when we talk of politics: " No, you see, we have been reduced to being a banana republic- only without the bananas". Well, no- it is not quite that bad, but the idea that the PiS are worthy partner for the Tories is... interesting.

I'll tell you what- if Cameron does go through with it, if I were a Conservative MEP, I would quit without a second glance, because it would simply show that Cameron himself is as ignorant and naive as the PiS, and yes they therefore do deserve each other. However there really does come a point when you have to stand up for something, instead of actually being negative. Since the Cameron bandwagon got going, we are encouraged to ignore the fact that either he believes nothing or that he has some kind of secret (but rather unpleasant) agenda- the electorate really are entitled to know which it is, before they sit in judgment.

Another interesting theme, in this most Catholic of countries, is speculation in the local press about Tony Blair being a Catholic. Personally- as a Protestant- I think that he already is. Therefore speculation that he will announce his conversion on leaving office, is frankly irrelevant. Neither, by the way should it matter. Except for the law,of course- but even in this most personal and private matter, Tony Blair has never met a law that he did not prefer to bend or break, rather than actually abolish- and this is the cause of the failure of his leadership.

Liberals believe that we already have too many laws- Mr. Blair's response to every crisis is to make new laws. One thing that Liberal Democrats might offer to the electorate next time is the abolition of restrictions on Catholics in high office- something that Blair himself has been too cowardly to enact.

Comments

Tristan said…
It seems that so many MEPs were threatening to leave that Cameron has backtracked on forming a new group.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...