Skip to main content

Vote early...

I have done my civic duty in Westminster, voting in the city council elections. I really quite enjoy the ritual of going into the polling place and casting my vote. The Liberal Democrats made the ward I live in into a target ward, and a huge amount of effort has gone in. Tens of thousands of leaflets and letters, canvassing, calling, fund raising- all for today. Over the past two years there have been over twenty Lib Dem leaflets in the ward, with the Conservatives sending out three and Labour none. If it was just a question of rewarding the efforts of the parties, then Sue Baring, Martin Thompson and Ben Way would be elected to the council with handsome majorities.

As we go through this process I reflect on some of the arguments about making voting compulsory. Personally I am very strongly against. Although I enjoy the ritual of voting, I am quite happy to listen to people who have different view. The fact is that our voting system is very imperfect. Votes are not all equal but depend on how marginal or otherwise your polling district is. It will be very interesting to see what changes take place in Scotland after the new, more proportional, voting system comes in next year. I hope that the rotten burghs of the central belt will now receive greater scrutiny as opposition councilors challenge the old regime, in some cases for the first time.

Even if our voting system was fair, then there is the issue of what power our elected representatives actually have. The way that the block grant can be manipulated essentially renders the power of the councils to control their own expenditure pretty marginal.

So why vote?

Well, in my case voting Liberal Democrat is a statement to change the system of government. Personally I want councils to gain more influence- and if they screw up, then they can take the consequences. At the moment Whitehall takes most of the decisions that are relevant to local government, and I believe that this should stop- and that only the Lib Dems are saying so. I am determined to vote positively and so am determined to vote. If, however there was no Lib Dem candidate why should I vote at all? It is certainly not up to the state to tell me that I must vote. If people do not feel inclined to vote, for whatever reason, then politicians should respect this- and learn from it.


James said…
Would you change your views on compulsory voting if there was provision to vote for 'None of the Above'? If NOTA won the seat, all the Parties would have to try again with different candidates until a victor emerged.
Surely even just the fear of being NOTA'd would galvanise candidates into more active politics...
Cicero said…
No- I oppose compulsory voting on principle. In any event you might have thought that low turnout might galvanise some politicians, and perhaps it does sometimes.
In practice I can not recall a single NOTA victory, except perhaps in student politics, so I think that it is a gesture that is meaningless.
In general, I do not believe that the state has the right to compel the citizen to do anything except under certain specific circumstances.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo