Skip to main content

European Decadence

Hilmar Kopper, the President of Deutsche Bank has shrewdly identified a key problem with Europe as follows: "To agree on keeping a status quo that can't be kept has nothing to do with consensus. It's decadence".

The scale of our problems in Europe is now enormous. Demographically, Europeans are not even replacing themselves. The steady decline in the economic significance of Europe is becoming a collapse, as India and China emerge as modern economies. As economic power flows elsewhere, the political and cultural influence of Europe ebbs too. Still the leaders of Europe do not admit, even to themselves, that the point of crisis is now upon us. Listless and nervous, the voters do not know where to turn. A succession of elections in Portugal, Germany, Italy, and Poland have demonstrated confusion as to how to face up to the scale of the problems. The institutions that have guided Europe through the years of recovery after the two world wars are now seen a shaky and no longer reliable. NATO, once so critical for European security, seems now only a mechanism to retain American engagement in Europe, when the US would rather look elsewhere. The European Union seems to have become a bloated failure, bogged down in over regulation and elitist projects that do not connect with the general population.

European weakness has become European decadence because of a failure of leadership. In country after country there has been a failure to tell the truth about the crises that we face. It is the dishonesty of the French elite that has brought the populace onto the streets in support of a system that can no longer be sustained. A "Liberal" of what ever kind, especially the reviled "Neo-Liberal" is a hate figure in a country that urgently needs liberal reform if it is to escape economic trap that fifth Republic social policy has created. In France, as in Germany, the crisis is not a distant prospect, but a wave crashing ashore. Though more distant, the crest of the wave is now clearly seen in Britain too- and leadership is similarly lacking.

Perhaps the problem is that most of the possible solutions to European problems are counter intuitive: fixing unemployment by making it easier to hire and fire, and easing immigration controls. Creating a more secure society by abolishing state controls on the economy. These are both hard for voters to understand and unttractive for political leaders since they reduce their power. Yet leaders of vision must understand that the stakes are high. Attempting to cling on to the status quo will fail. Leadership is required: difficult decisions must be made now. Without leadership, the decisions will be made anyway- but not in Europe, and not to European advantage.


Anonymous said…
thank you nice sharing

cep program

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo