Skip to main content

A leap of faith

Tony Blair thinks that his decision to go to war will be judged by God. The fact that George W. Bush also trusted to his faith makes me cringe. This messianic appeal to faith I personally find repellent. It smacks of the hypocrite - "but I say unto you that they have their reward".

However, perhaps it also explains why the West is getting into such a mess. The certitudes of faith should be leavened with doubt, otherwise we might have leaders of the West who believe that their personal relationship with the divinity renders them automatically successful. Then, they might insist that they alone know what is good for their citizens- that any crime is permissible- the abolition of "inalienable rights" such as Life or Liberty, for example. The prosecution of war, irrespective of constitution or international law; the use of torture; the intrusion of the state into any aspect of life that "the war on terror" requires - all this is allowed and justified by faith. In the words of Cromwell "I beseech you... think it possible that you may be mistaken". However, such faith as that professed by Bush or Blair allows no room for doubt. The consequences are there for all to see. In battling the perverted certainties of Islamo-fascism, the West has fallen into the hands of justified sinners of equal self righteousness.

Whether we talk of investment and the ideas of Nassim Nicholas Taleb, that I have discussed on this blog before; or of science and Mandelbrot or Heisenberg; or of politics and Aristotle and Cicero, the key is to understand that we ourselves are inherently fallible. Thus we must construct political systems that nor merely accept that their leaders are flawed, but which expects that we are and bases its design on that single key assumption. In fact we have mostly done so. That is why the tinkering with the constitutional arrangement in Britain or the United States must be resisted so fiercely. In fact in Britain, the fact that constitutional order can be subverted so easily should now make us more determined than ever to create a political system that is less open to corruption and misuse. The latest allegations against David Mills, whether true or not, show again how high-level corruption can reach into the heart of the state and undermine our democracy with money.

It is no longer enough to trust our politicians, we must- in that Russian proverb much quoted by Ronald Reagan- "trust and verify". No matter how certain the Prime Minister may be of his faith and his justification, he must verify himself, through the constitution, to the people who employ him: the British people.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You like most of the media are completely mis-representing what Tony Blair said on Parkinson. His comments were very clearly in the context of personal responsibility and judgement - he was not using 'God' to justify his decision over Iraq in the way that Bush - and indeed many main stream American politicians - have done.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Breaking the Brexit logjam

The fundamental problem of Brexit has not been that the UK voted to leave the European Union. The problem has been the fact that the vote was hijacked by ignorant, grandstanding fools who interpreted the vote as a will to sever all and every link between the UK and the European Union. That was then and is now a catastrophic policy. To default to WTO rules, when any member of the WTO could stop that policy was a recipe for the UK to be held hostage by any state with an act to grind against us. A crash out from the EU, without any structure to cope, was an act of recklessness that should disqualify anyone advocating it from any position of power whatsoever. That is now the most likely option because the Conservative leadership, abetted by the cowardly extremism of Corbyn, neither understood the scale of the crisis, now had any vision of how to tackle it. Theresa May is a weak and hapless Prime Minster, and her problems started when she failed to realize that there was a compromise that